MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103231026 · doi:10.1109/temc.2009.2019763

Introducing Nonuniform Grids into the FDTD Solution of the Transmission-Line Equations by Renormalizing the Per-Unit-Length Parameters

2009· article· en· W2103231026 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto B. Armenta, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodDiscretizationGridTransmission lineMathematical analysisMathematicsTransmission (telecommunications)Finite difference methodMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsComputer scienceGeometryPhysicsOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A challenging aspect of using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method to solve nonuniform transmission-line equations is to choose a discretization grid with an adequate spatial resolution. When the per-unit-length parameters have strong variations, an efficient problem-solving strategy requires the use of a nonuniform discretization grid. This paper presents a nonuniform gridding method that makes use of an analytically defined coordinate transformation to map a nonuniformly spaced grid onto a uniformly spaced grid where the standard FDTD time stepping equations can be applied. This approach absorbs all the details of the nonuniform grid into effective or renormalized per-unit-length parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic CompatibilitySame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207