MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103376474 · doi:10.1109/icme.2014.6890204

A novel cloud gaming framework using joint video and graphics streaming

2014· article· en· W2103376474 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoming Nan, Xun Guo, Yan Lu, Yifeng He, Ling Guan, Shipeng Li, Baining Guo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphicsFrame rateReal-time computer graphicsFrame (networking)Cloud computingBandwidth (computing)Real-time computingComputer graphics (images)3D computer graphicsMultimediaComputer networkComputer visionOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the popularity of smart phones and tablets, users have an increasing desire to enjoy ubiquitous game playing. The emerging cloud gaming turns this desire into reality, enabling users to play games at anywhere on any devices. However, due to the huge amount of data transmission, it is challenging to provide a high quality game experience under the limited bandwidth capacity. In this paper, we propose a novel cloud gaming framework, in which we introduce two synchronized graphics buffers at both the server and the client sides. The server not only streams the compressed frames captured from game scenes, but also progressively transmits graphics data. The received graphics data is used to generate reference frames. When compressing the next frame, the cloud server will choose the reference frame with a lower residual error, from the previous frame and the current frame rendered from the graphics buffer. With the accumulation of graphics data, the frame rendered from the graphics buffer is close to the captured frame, which greatly reduces the transmission bit rates. Based on the proposed framework, we study the rate allocation problem, in which we optimize the allocated bit rates between the compressed frame and the graphics data to minimize the total distortion under the bandwidth constraint. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework can optimally allocate bit rates to achieve a minimal distortion for cloud gaming compared to the traditional video streaming and graphics streaming approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207