Development Beyond Neoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development Beyond Neoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy , David Craig and Doug Porter, London and New York: Routledge, 2006, pp. xii, 340. In their collaboratively written book Development Beyond Neoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy , David Craig and Doug Porter set out to make sense of recent changes in the liberal development project and, in doing so, chart the emergence of good governance and poverty reduction strategies (PRSs), two of the guiding principles of the post-Washington consensus. Both authors have been participants in many of the events examined, empirically resting their arguments on participatory observation in four countries while theoretically drawing on governmentality studies. The main focus of the book is development's shift towards institution building, decentralized governance and poverty reduction, which is part of the larger move from the Washington to the post-Washington consensus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it