Coupled nitrogen and oxygen isotope fractionation of nitrate during assimilation by cultures of marine phytoplankton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the first measurements of coupled nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O) isotopic variations of nitrate (NO ) during its assimilation by laboratory cultures of marine phytoplankton and derive the N and O kinetic isotope effects for nitrate assimilation by three species of diatoms ( Thalassiosira weissflogii , Thalassiosira oceanica , and Thalassiosira pseudonana ) and a coccolithophorid ( Emiliana huxleyi ). Large interspecies and intraspecies variations in the N isotope effects were observed. The O isotope effect associated with nitrate consumption was consistently close to the N isotope effect, such that the 18 O/ 16 O and 15 N/ 14 N of nitrate varied in a ratio of ~1 : 1, regardless of species or of the magnitude of the isotope effect. In addition, the 18 O/ 16 O and 15 N/ 14 N of internal nitrate of T. weissflogii grown under various environmental conditions were elevated relative to the medium nitrate by a proportion of ~1 : 1. These findings are consistent with a nitrate isotopic fractionation mechanism that involves nitrate reduction as the chief fractionating step. The observed N:O isotopic coupling during nitrate assimilation suggests that combined N and O isotopic measurements of water column nitrate can provide new constraints on the ocean N cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".