Permissive Underfeeding of the Critically Ill Patient
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rise in the popularity of nutrition support in the 1970s was associated with the concept of "hyperalimentation." This concept was based on the early findings that increased metabolic rates were observed in various disease states such as trauma, sepsis, and burns. The aim was to feed 40% to 100% above the basal metabolic rate to avoid weight loss associated with critical illness. Since that time, several observations have indicated that permissive underfeeding may be beneficial because: (a) the metabolic rate is not markedly increased in most patients with critical illness except burns; (b) weight gain during nutrition support in critical illness is not caused by a gain in nitrogen but fat; (c) energy intake as glucose in excess of needs causes increased carbon dioxide production and a fatty liver; (d) hyperglycemia increases the risk of infective complications; and (e) a controlled trial of preoperative nutrition in which patients received 1000 kcal above the metabolic rate increased infectious complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it