MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103625133 · doi:10.5539/ass.v9n7p231

Electricity Consumption Analysis Using Spline Regression Models: The Case of a Turkish Province

2013· article· en· W2103625133 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ömer Alkan, Aşır Genç, Erkan Oktay, Ali Kemal Çeli̇k

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolynomial regressionSpline (mechanical)Regression analysisElectricityEconometricsTurkishStatisticsEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)Quadratic functionLinear regressionMathematicsQuadratic equationElectric potential energyRegressionEconomicsEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy is one of the indispensible elements of human life and electrical energy is adopted as the most frequently used energy type. As this type of energy can not be stored at the present time, it has to be instantly consumed. In other words, the demand of the consumers has to be compensated, immediately. This paper employs to model the electrical consumption of Erzurum province in 2011 by spline regression and to decide whether a statistically seasonal variation exists for this consumption. The one-year data set of the investigation was obtained from Turkish Electricity Transmission Company Provincial Directorate of Erzurum and was analyzed by the agency of continuous partial polynomial spline regressions. This analysis determined three knots and fits linear, quadratic and cubic spline regression models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207