MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103850767 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518218

Cooperative MIMO-beamforming for multiuser relay networks

2008· article· en· W2103850767 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingRelayMIMOComputer scienceNode (physics)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Optimization problemConvex optimizationComputer networkTelecommunicationsRegular polygonAlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a beamforming algorithm for multiuser MIMO-relaying wireless systems. We consider a relaying scenario with multiple sources transmitting to one or more destination nodes through several relay terminals. Each relay is equipped with multiple antennas. We jointly design the beamforming matrices of the cooperating relays by minimizing both the noise received at each destination node and the interference caused by the sources not targeting this node. We impose additional constraints that preserve the received signal from each source at its targeted destination node. The relay beamforming problem is shown to be a convex optimization problem and is formulated as a second-order cone program that can be efficiently solved using interior point methods. Numerical simulations are presented showing the superior performance of our beamforming technique compared to previously proposed zero forcing relay beamforming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it