MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103900319 · doi:10.1139/t03-050

Experimental compression of loose sands: relevance to porosity reduction during burial in sedimentary basins

2003· article· en· W2103900319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorosityGrain sizeCarbonateGeologyMineralogySedimentary rockStress (linguistics)Geotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceMetallurgyGeochemistryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the one-dimensional stress–strain behaviour of sand at effective stresses as high as 50 MPa. Experiments were performed on 22 sands (approx. 150 tests) with different grain size, uniformity coefficient, angularity, density, grain mineralogy, and clay content. The results show that minor grain corner crushing starts at stresses of 2–8 MPa. The point of maximum curvature (yield point) in the porosity (n) versus logarithm of vertical effective stress (σ' v ) curve defines the initiation of marked particle crushing. The stress at the yield point varies between 3 and 31 MPa depending on sand characteristics. A low yield stress is indicative of high porosity loss in the interval of intermediate stress (5–25 MPa). The yield stress is low when the grain size is large, grains are angular, grain strength is low, and uniformity coefficient is low. The lowest yield stress value occurs in the coarser carbonate sand, and the highest in the chert-rich sands. The sands rich in clays are highly compressible up to 25 MPa. At stresses higher than ~10 MPa, the coarser biogenic carbonate sands maintain higher porosities than the other sands. This can be explained by the fact that coarser biogenic carbonate sands have low yield stresses due to high angularity and low grain strength and initially there is local grain crushing at grain contacts. This increases the area of the grain contacts, so the coarser carbonate sands become less compressible at higher stresses. Within the high stress range (25–50 MPa) the porosity loss differences related to grain size, grain shape, grain mineralogy, and sand uniformity coefficient are significantly reduced. Hence the greater compressibility of lithic and carbonate sands becomes less evident in the high-stress interval as the grain size increases.Key words: sand, grain crushing, grain size, high stress, compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it