MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103940338 · doi:10.1109/coginf.2010.5599684

A study of particle swarm optimization for cognitive machines

2010· article· en· W2103940338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationMulti-swarm optimizationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationConvergence (economics)Optimization problemTransient (computer programming)Process (computing)MetaheuristicAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a study of the properties of optimization algorithms for use in cognitive machines through five key measures: (i) speed of convergence, (ii) degree of exploration of the parameter space, (iii) storage and system size, (iv) adaptability, and (v) multi-scale capabilities. Based on these factors, a novel study of the trajectories of a particle in the particle swarm optimization algorithm is performed both in the time and frequency domain. The analysis shows that the trajectories of particles can be separated into a transient and a steady state periods where the transient is wide-sense stationary with long term dependancies that show the evolutionary properties of the algorithm as it converges on a solution. The steady state shows an increased degree of exploration of the parameter space that allow the algorithm to improve on the solution found over time. The results show the advantages of particle swarm optimization and inherent properties that make this optimization algorithm a suitable choice for use in cognitive machines. The information learned from this analysis can further be used to extract complexity measures to classify the behavior and control of particle swarm optimization, and make proper quick decisions on what to do next. The decision process often requires more alternatives to be considered in a short window of time than it is physically possible for a real-time system [Kins04]. Thus, in order to make good decisions without exploring all possible paths, a cognitive system requires optimization techniques that can survey the possible options, and quickly select the best option possible. The paper reviews the requirements for an ideal optimization technique for use in cognitive systems and proposes the particle swarm optimization algorithm as one technique that is designed to satisfy these requirements. In order to show the properties of PSO, a novel trajectory, time, and frequency domain analyses of single particles along individual dimensions are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it