MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104289244 · doi:10.1080/07408170208928929

The value of information used in inventory control of a make-to-order inventory-production system

2002· article· en· W2104289244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIIE Transactions · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of WaterlooDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInventory controlProduction (economics)Value (mathematics)Order (exchange)Economic order quantityInventory valuationPerpetual inventoryControl (management)Operations researchOperations managementInventory theoryComputer scienceBusinessMathematicsStatisticsEngineeringEconomicsMicroeconomicsMarketingSupply chainArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies a make-to-order inventory-production system consisting of a warehouse and a workshop. The concept of information level as the detail available on the number of unfilled demands at the workshop is introduced. The focal point is the value of the information used in inventory control in the warehouse. Dynamic programming is used to develop an algorithm for computing the optimal replenishment policy and the average total inventory cost per product. Numerical analysis is carried out and the results show that information used in inventory control can reduce the total inventory cost significantly. It is shown that the classical (Q, R) policy may not perform well if information about the number of demands is partially or fully available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it