MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104289831 · doi:10.5555/1218112.1218264

Applying DEVS modeling for discrete event multiple model control of a time varying plant

2006· article· en· W2104289831 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDEVSDiscrete event dynamic systemComputer scienceDiscrete event simulationReuseDiscrete time and continuous timeEvent (particle physics)Formalism (music)Control engineeringReal-time computingDistributed computingDiscrete systemModeling and simulationSimulationAlgorithmEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, we have developed a Modeling and Simulation-Driven Engineering methodology for engineering embedded Real-Time systems. This approach relies on the use of the DEVS formalism for developing components of real-time embedded systems using incremental development. Here, we show how to apply these techniques for an application in hybrid control. The model defines a discrete-event for a time varying plant based on multiple model control. Our discrete event approach permitted us to define such application, seamlessly integrating discrete event and continuous components. The approach allows secure, reliable testing, analysis of different levels of abstraction in the system, and model reuse. The common problem of controller wind-up or parameter estimation bursting can be avoided when performing this proposed form of discrete event adaptive control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it