MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104429051 · doi:10.5589/m10-080

Operational calibration of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) visible and near-infrared channels

2010· article· en· W2104429051 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Xiangqian Wu, Jerry Sullivan, Andrew K. Heidinger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsAdvanced very-high-resolution radiometerRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceCalibrationSatelliteRadiometerHigh resolutionMeteorologyMeteorological satelliteGeographyPhysicsGeostationary orbit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) visible and near-infrared channels must be calibrated after launch to maintain the accuracy of data derived from these channels for quantitative utilizations. The postlaunch calibration of these channels can only be carried out vicariously. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Environmental Satellite, Data, an Information Service (NESDIS) has been using the Libyan Desert as reference for operational calibration of AVHRR visible and near-infrared channels since 1995. A previous algorithm was successful correcting for the long-term instrument degradation in recalibration but had difficulty updating instrument calibration in near-real-time operation. This paper describes the operational calibration algorithm implemented since 2003, which overcomes the existing shortcomings by reducing target contamination and accounting for the effects of target bidirectional reflectance distribution function. Application of the algorithm shortens the latency of postlaunch calibration from 3 to 4 years for NOAA-14 and NOAA-16 to less than 2 years for NOAA-17 and to a few months for later satellites. Compared with the previous algorithm, the current algorithm enhances the calibration precision from 1.7% to 0.9% for channel 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207