MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104831039 · doi:10.1111/ejss.12181

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions from a maize‐wheat sequence by decreasing soil nitrate concentration: effects of split application of pig slurry and dicyandiamide

2015· article· en· W2104831039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsNitrous oxideChemistryNitrificationAgronomySlurryNitrogenNitrateUreaFertilizerAnimal scienceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Pig slurry ( PS ) is a valuable nitrogen ( N ) source for agricultural crops but the simultaneous supply of readily decomposable carbon and mineral N can result in large soil nitrous oxide ( N 2 O ) emissions. Our objective was to determine the individual and combined effects of split PS application and addition of a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD ) on N 2 O emissions and soil mineral N concentration in southern B razil. Soil N 2 O fluxes were measured from N ovember 2010 to N ovember 2011 from a maize ( Zea mays L. )‐wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ) sequence under various fertilizer treatments: no‐ N control, PS applied in a single pre‐plant dose with or without DCD , PS split‐applied with or without DCD , and urea split‐applied. Cumulative N 2 O emissions increased linearly ( R 2 = 0.73) with increasing soil nitrate ( NO 3 − ) exposure, indicating that management practices aimed at reducing soil NO 3 − concentrations can decrease soil N 2 O emissions. In total for the two crops, splitting PS reduced N 2 O emission factors ( EF ) by 33%, whereas the addition of DCD reduced EF by 60 and 41% when PS was applied in single and split doses, respectively. However, splitting PS or adding DCD failed to reduce N 2 O losses more than a single pre‐plant PS application in maize where background soil NO 3 − concentrations were large. The addition of DCD to PS applied as a single pre‐plant dose resulted in the largest reduction in soil N 2 O emissions, whereas splitting PS with and without DCD resulted in significantly smaller abatements. Consequently, we concluded that adding DCD to PS in a single pre‐plant application is a better option than splitting PS applications for reducing soil N 2 O emissions in no‐till cereal cropping systems in southern B razil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it