Microdielectric analysis and curing kinetics of an epoxy resin system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Microdielectric analysis (DEA) was carried out to investigate the cure behavior of a bisphenol F epoxy/aromatic amine resin system using an online dielectric cure monitoring technique. Ionic conductivity measured by a microdielectric sensor under isothermal conditions was correlated to the degree of cure and glass‐transition temperature, which are determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Results obtained by isothermal DSC measurement were used to establish a cure kinetic model for the epoxy resin. Experimental results show that the ratio of the ion conductivity to the initial ion conductivity, Logσ/Logσ 0 , has a linear relation with the glass‐transition temperature. Furthermore, correlations between ion conductivity and degree of cure and cure rate are established using the best fit of the measured data. Cure behavior of the epoxy resin obtained by DEA is compared with that predicted by the cure kinetics model. Good agreement was observed. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:150–158, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it