MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105197049 · doi:10.5006/1.3319100

Effect of Field Operational Variables on Internal Pitting Corrosion of Oil and Gas Pipelines

2009· article· en· W2105197049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaDevon Energy (Canada)
FundersAustralian Government
KeywordsPitting corrosionCorrosionPipeline transportMetallurgyMaterials sciencePetroleum engineeringFossil fuelOil fieldEnvironmental scienceForensic engineeringEngineeringWaste managementEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were conducted in six operating oil and gas production pipelines over four years to determine internal pitting corrosion rates under realistic operating conditions. —Pitting corrosion rates were similar when the compositions of surface layers were similar.—When a compact layer of single species formed, the surface was protected from pitting corrosion; the iron sulfide (FeS) layer was more protective than the siderite (FeCO3) layer.—When multiple layers of several species formed, the susceptibility of the surface to pitting corrosion increased. Frequent changes in the pipeline operating conditions facilitated the formation of multiple layers.—When no surface layer formed, the susceptibility of the surface to pitting corrosion decreased but was not eliminated. Extraneous materials (e.g., sand) on the surface facilitated pitting corrosion.—In the absence of surface layer and extraneous materials, no pitting corrosion was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it