Finite-difference time-domain solution of light scattering by dielectric particles with large complex refractive indices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique is examined for its suitability for studying light scattering by highly refractive dielectric particles. It is found that, for particles with large complex refractive indices, the FDTD solution of light scattering is sensitive to the numerical treatments associated with the particle boundaries. Herein, appropriate treatments of the particle boundaries and related electric fields in the frequency domain are introduced and examined to improve the accuracy of the FDTD solutions. As a result, it is shown that, for a large complex refractive index of 7.1499 + 2.914i for particles with size parameters smaller than 6, the errors in extinction and absorption efficiencies from the FDTD method are generally less than approximately 4%. The errors in the scattering phase function are less than approximately 5%. We conclude that the present FDTD scheme with appropriate boundary treatments can provide a reliable solution for light scattering by nonspherical particles with large complex refractive indices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it