MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105705286 · doi:10.1109/tpds.2003.1195413

Dynamic querying of streaming data with the dQUOB system

2003· article· en· W2105705286 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Beth Plale, Karsten Schwan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArkansas High Performance Computing Center, University of ArkansasCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceData stream miningQuery languageVisualizationData visualizationRelational databaseAbstractionData modelingDatabaseData miningDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data streaming has established itself as a viable communication abstraction in data-intensive parallel and distributed computations, occurring in applications such as scientific visualization, performance monitoring, and large-scale data transfer. A known problem in large-scale event communication is tailoring the data received at the consumer. It is the general problem of extracting data of interest from a data source, a problem that the database community has successfully addressed with SOL queries, a time tested, user-friendly way for noncomputer scientists to access data. By leveraging the efficiency of query processing provided by relational queries, the dQUOB system provides a conceptual relational data model and SOL query access over streaming data. Queries can be used to extract data, combine streams, and create new streams. The language augments queries with an action to enable more complex data transformations such as Fourier transforms. The dQUOB system has been applied to two large-scale distributed applications: a safety critical autonomous robotics simulation and scientific software visualization for global atmospheric transport modeling. In this paper, we present the dQUOB system and the results of performance evaluation undertaken to assess its applicability in data-intensive wide-area computations, where the benefit of portable data transformation must be evaluated against the cost of continuous query evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed SystemsSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207