MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105720696 · doi:10.1504/ijmic.2012.045693

Machine vibration prediction using ANFIS and wavelet packet decomposition

2012· article· en· W2105720696 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modelling Identification and Control · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSyncrude
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemWavelet packet decompositionWaveletSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceVibrationSeries (stratigraphy)DecompositionFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceWavelet transformFuzzy control systemAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new method for building time series model to predict machine vibration values. Instead of building a time series model based on the raw machine vibration signal, the vibration signal will be first decomposed into different levels using wavelet packet decomposition (WPD). Sub-signals can be reconstructed from those wavelet packet coefficients. Time series model is built for each of those sub-signals, using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The final prediction value is the sum of the prediction values of all the models. Comparing to the other two methods, which are building ANFIS model based on the raw vibration signal and building ANFIS models based on the sub-signals generated with discrete wavelet decomposition, experimental results show that the method using ANFIS and WPD outperforms the other two methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it