MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105829619 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2006.1683516

A successive refinement approach to wireless infrastructure network deployment

2006· article· en· W2105829619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsComputer scienceWireless networkSoftware deploymentThroughputWirelessWireless distribution systemPower controlRule of thumbChannel (broadcasting)Distributed computingComputer networkPower (physics)Heterogeneous networkTelecommunicationsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been a recent proliferation in wireless infrastructure network deployments. In a typical deployment, an installer uses either a one-time site survey or rules of thumb to place wireless access points and allocate them with channels and power levels. Because the access point location problem is inherently complex and one that requires tradeoffs among competing requirements, these approaches can result in either dead spots or significant unintended interference among wireless access points. This degrades network performance for end clients, with throughput reduction factors of 4x found in field measurements. In this paper, we take a first step towards improving client performance by coordinating choices of channels and power levels at wireless access points using a successive refinement approach. Our contributions are two-fold: first, we develop a mathematical model that crisply defines the solution space and identifies the characteristics of an optimal channel and power-level configuration. Second, we present heuristics that, under some simplifying assumptions, yield near-optimal configurations. We use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of our heuristics. We find that the choice of heuristics for transmit power control impacts performance more than the channel allocation strategy, especially at high densities. Also, surprisingly, randomly assigning channels to access points appears to be an effective strategy at higher deployment densities. Taken together, we believe that this study paves the way to designing rapidly deployable real-world infrastructure networks that also have good performance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207