Metallic Cylindrical EBG Structures With Defects: Directivity Analysis and Design Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analysis is presented of the directivity and the design optimization of cylindrical electromagnetic band gap (CEBG) structures constituted of metallic wires and with defects. The directivity is studied for different transversal periods, radial periods and numbers of rings. In the proposed configuration, the defects are designed by removing multiple wires, such as to form a horn-shaped aperture inside the periodic structure. From numerical results, obtained with a home-made finite difference time domain (FDTD) code, it is shown that the structures with defects present a directive beam in the stop-bands of the corresponding structures without defects. The radiation characteristics of the CEBG material are compared with those of an equivalent-plane sectoral horn to explain the directivity mechanism. An optimization method is also proposed for minimizing the number of wires. To validate the analysis, an optimized directive antenna with a dipole as an excitation source was fabricated and measured.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it