MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106747458 · doi:10.1177/1475921712451955

Nonparametric analysis of structural health monitoring data for identification and localization of changes: Concept, lab, and real-life studies

2012· article· en· W2106747458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFederal Highway AdministrationFlorida Department of Transportation
KeywordsStructural health monitoringServiceability (structure)Nonparametric statisticsBridge (graph theory)Computer scienceData miningIdentification (biology)Data acquisitionCorrelationReliability engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural health monitoring systems integrate novel experimental technologies, analytical methods, and information technologies for a number of objectives such as detecting structural changes and damage as well as assessing the condition, safety, and serviceability of the monitored structure. The objective of this article is to present a correlation-based methodology as an effective nonparametric data analysis approach for detecting and localizing structural changes using strain data under operational loading conditions. While several methods have been explored in the literature, the focus of this article is to explore a practical and cost-effective (in terms of sensor, data acquisition, and analysis) methodology to identify structural problems. The methodology presented here is based on tracking correlation coefficients between strain time histories at different locations. After discussing the background, the effectiveness of the methodology is first demonstrated on a laboratory test structure. A unique contribution of this study is the validation of the methodology on a real-life bridge, which was monitored before damage was induced, during the bridge was damaged, and after damage was repaired. It is shown that structural changes can be detected and located for both the laboratory test structure and the real-life bridge using the variations in the correlation matrices. Since the real-life bridge was monitored under different conditions, the effectiveness of the bridge repair is also presented in comparative fashion with respect to before damage conditions. Some of the critical issues such as signal processing, data length, and level of data separation for change detection are also discussed. The correlation-based data analysis methodology is computationally efficient and easy to use, especially for handling large amounts of monitoring data. The results show that this methodology has the potential to be easily applied by engineers to different kinds of civil infrastructure for condition monitoring and maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it