MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106777832 · doi:10.1109/9.983355

Hierarchically accelerated dynamic programming for finite-state machines

2002· article· en· W2106777832 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePartition (number theory)Dynamic programmingFinite-state machineIterated functionHierarchyAbstractionGridState (computer science)Mathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A procedure called hierarchically accelerated dynamic programming (HADP) is presented which, at the cost of a degree of suboptimality, can significantly accelerate dynamic programming algorithms for discrete event systems modeled by finite-state machines (FSMs). The methodology is based. upon the (possibly iterated) dynamical abstraction of a given FSM by state aggregation in order to generate a so-called partition machine hierarchy. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the HADP procedure to generate globally optimal solutions are given as well as bounds on the degree of suboptimality of the method. A group of examples called the Broken Manhattan Grid problems is used to illustrate an implementation of HADP with two and three level hierarchies. A set of open problems is described concerning the construction and selection of the partition machine abstractions and the improvement of the estimation of HADP suboptimality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it