MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106834551 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2006.874766

On the Design of Minimum BER Linear Space-Time Block Codes for MIMO Systems Equipped With MMSE Receivers

2006· article· en· W2106834551 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Liu, J.-K. Zhang, K.M. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOBlock codeMathematicsMinimum mean square errorAlgorithmBit error rateRayleigh fadingQAMUpper and lower boundsQuadrature amplitude modulationControl theory (sociology)FadingComputer scienceDecoding methodsStatisticsBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the design of a full-rate linear space-time block code for coherent multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems under a quasi-static Rayleigh flat-fading environment. Our design targets specifically at the use of a linear minimum mean-square error (MMSE) receiver that minimizes the asymptotic average bit error rate (BER) when the transmitted signal is selected from a 4-QAM constellation. This optimization problem is solved in two main stages: 1) a lower bound on the BER is first minimized, and 2)how this minimized lower bound can be achieved is then shown. By exploiting a rigorous convex optimization technique without any assumption on the code, we prove that individual unitary and trace-orthogonal structures are the necessary and sufficient conditions to assure the minimum asymptotic average BER with an MMSE detector. An algorithm is provided for an efficient generation of our codes, and simulation results confirm that our optimally designed codes are indeed superior in performance compared to some other commonly used codes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207