MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106907017 · doi:10.1002/jrs.2761

Background removal from polarized Raman spectra of tooth enamel using the wavelet transform

2010· article· en· W2106907017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raman Spectroscopy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyEnamel paintWavelet transformWaveletNoise (video)Materials scienceSpectral lineTransformation (genetics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePhysicsImage (mathematics)Chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A wavelet transformation method is introduced to remove the large fluorescence background from polarized Raman spectra of stained tooth enamel. This method exploits the wavelet multiresolution decomposition where the experimental Raman spectrum is decomposed into signals with different frequency components, and where the lowest frequency background and highest frequency noise are removed. This method is optimized using a simulated collection of parallel‐polarized and cross‐polarized Raman spectra of the enamel and then applied to a set of experimental data. The results show that the wavelet transform technique can extract the pure spectra from background and noise, with the depolarization ratio used to discriminate between early dental caries and sound enamel preserved. Copyright © 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it