MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107750969 · doi:10.1177/1046878108325440

History and Simulation/Gaming: Living With Two Solitudes

2011· article· en· W2107750969 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSimulation & Gaming · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsRecyc PHP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Scope (computer science)Dimension (graph theory)Bridge (graph theory)SociologyAestheticsEpistemologyComputer scienceMedia studiesHistoryWorld Wide WebArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The History and Simulation/Gaming special issue should be understood as being bi-directional. The historical theme refers to the use of games and simulations, to the study of history, and to the place of history—or perhaps, simply the dimension of time and change—in the use and design of games. Historians in universities, designers and players of the well-known historical games, and the gamers who read and contribute to this journal seem to belong to distinct classes. This special issue, a modest undertaking in length and scope, is an attempt to bridge the chasm between the two classes. A sense of history can be a source of strength, intellectual or otherwise. The articles in this special issue are an opportunity for historians, gamers, and historical gamers to briefly connect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it