MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107751407 · doi:10.1109/ted.2004.837389

Electrical Characterization of Polymer-Based FETs Fabricated by Spin-Coating Poly(3-alkylthiophene)s

2004· article· en· W2107751407 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorMaterials scienceDopantSpin coatingSubthreshold conductionOptoelectronicsSubthreshold slopeThreshold voltagePolymerElectron mobilityCoatingTransistorDopingEquivalent series resistanceField-effect transistorLayer (electronics)VoltageComposite materialElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of two different polymer thin-film transistors (TFTs), based on spin-coating of poly(3-hexylthiophene)-P3HT and poly(3-hexadecylthiophene)-P3HDT, are studied. A model is developed to interpret the results and to explain the differences between these two polymers. Various parameters of the semiconducting polymers, including bulk mobility, field-effect mobility, trap density, and unintentional dopant concentration are estimated. The model takes into account the domination of the bulk current over the channel current in the subthreshold regime as well as the effects of the depletion layer as parasitic resistances in series with the channel resistance. Furthermore, the effects of the films thickness on the electrical characteristics of these TFTs are discussed. Compared to the P3HT, the P3HDT-based TFT has a lower subthreshold slope, higher on current ratio, and higher field-effect mobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it