MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107907494 · doi:10.1109/mts.2011.941647

Wireless and Empire: Geopolitics, Radio Industry, and Ionosphere in the British Empire, 1918-1939 (Anduaga, A.; 2009) [Book review]

2011· article· en· W2107907494 on OpenAlexaff
Chen‐Pang Yeang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Technology and Society Magazine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeopoliticsEmpireScholarshipContext (archaeology)PoliticsIonosphereMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologySocial scienceHistoryGeophysicsLawArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Built on the less visible, yet dynamic, scholarship on the history of geophysics, the author-amidst a handful of recent historians-situates the beginning and growth of radio technology in the context of atmospheric science during the first half of the twentieth century. The outcome of this novel focus is the first book-length historical study of radio ionospheric propagation research. The author's focus of the book is to portray a complex social structure that shaped radio ionospheric propagation research in its formative years. Distinct intellectual traditions in physical sciences, the radio industry, engineering education, science policies, and geopolitics were all intertwined with one another in a kaleidoscopic frame. The author attempts to explain the ionosphere in terms of its impact on social, political, cultural, and economic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Technology and Society MagazineSame topicSpace exploration and regulationFrench-language works237,207