MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107907494 · doi:10.1109/mts.2011.941647

Wireless and Empire: Geopolitics, Radio Industry, and Ionosphere in the British Empire, 1918-1939 (Anduaga, A.; 2009) [Book review]

2011· article· en· W2107907494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Technology and Society Magazine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeopoliticsEmpireScholarshipContext (archaeology)PoliticsIonosphereMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologySocial scienceHistoryGeophysicsLawArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Built on the less visible, yet dynamic, scholarship on the history of geophysics, the author-amidst a handful of recent historians-situates the beginning and growth of radio technology in the context of atmospheric science during the first half of the twentieth century. The outcome of this novel focus is the first book-length historical study of radio ionospheric propagation research. The author's focus of the book is to portray a complex social structure that shaped radio ionospheric propagation research in its formative years. Distinct intellectual traditions in physical sciences, the radio industry, engineering education, science policies, and geopolitics were all intertwined with one another in a kaleidoscopic frame. The author attempts to explain the ionosphere in terms of its impact on social, political, cultural, and economic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it