MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108046507 · doi:10.1109/tac.2006.878745

On Overshoot and Nonminimum Phase Zeros

2006· article· en· W2108046507 on OpenAlexaff
James Stewart, D.E. Davison

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvershoot (microwave communication)Control theory (sociology)Settling timePole–zero plotMathematicsStep responseTransient responseMinimum phaseLoop (graph theory)Transfer functionInfinityPhase (matter)Computer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsControl (management)EngineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is widely known that real nonminimum phase zeros lead to step response undershoot, and that the size of the undershoot necessarily tends to infinity as the settling time tends to zero. In this note, we show that the presence of two or more real nonminimum phase zeros can lead to step response overshoot in addition to undershoot. A lower bound on the overshoot is derived, and it is shown that the overshoot, like the undershoot, necessarily tends to infinity as the settling time tends to zero. The results are derived for single-input-single-output linear time-invariant continuous-time systems, and apply to both open-loop control and general two degree-of-freedom closed-loop control

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207