MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108129761 · doi:10.1345/aph.1r621

Prevalence and Risk of Potential Cytochrome P450–Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions in Older Hospitalized Patients with Polypharmacy

2013· article· en· W2108129761 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Doan, Hubert Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, Julie Roy, Jacques Turgeon, Cara Tannenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Pharmacotherapy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolypharmacyMedicineDrugDrug interactionPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: As rates of polypharmacy rise and medication regimens become more complex, the risk of potential cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a growing clinical concern for older adults. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of potential CYP-mediated DDIs in older hospitalized adults with polypharmacy and analyze the relationship between the number of drugs dispensed and the probability of these interactions in this high-risk population. METHODS: A prospective 16-week cohort study was conducted among consecutive new patients aged 65 years and older with polypharmacy (>5 drugs) admitted to a community hospital. The medication profiles of these patients were analyzed with a new multidrug cytochrome-specific software program. The prevalence of potential CYP-mediated DDIs was determined, with the probability calculated as a function of the number of medications dispensed using multivariate Poisson regression adjusted for age and sex. Comparative performance of the software program and a standard 2-drug alert program for detecting these DDIs was evaluated using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. Pharmacists' decisions to recommend medication adjustment based on the probability of CYP-mediated DDIs were recorded. RESULTS: The prevalence of potential CYP-mediated DDIs detected among 275 older adults with polypharmacy was 80%. The probability of at least 1 CYP-mediated DDI was 50% for persons taking 5-9 drugs, 81% with 10-14 drugs, 92% with 15-19 drugs, and 100% with 20 or more drugs. Addition of each medication to a 5-drug regimen conferred a 12% increased risk of a potential CYP-mediated DDI after adjustment for age and sex (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.09-1.14). The multidrug software identified a median increase of 3 (95% CI 2.5-3.5) potential CYP-mediated DDIs per patient, compared to use of the standard 2-drug alert software. Pharmacists targeted patients for medication adjustment or close clinical monitoring in 23% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of potential CYP-mediated DDIs is high in geriatric patients with polypharmacy. The risk of DDIs increases as a function of the number of medications dispensed. Pharmacists' decision to intervene for potential CYP-mediated DDIs depends on clinical judgment in addition to the output from drug alert software programs, but may be facilitated by a single multicomponent, multidrug potential CYP-mediated DDI assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations186
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of PharmacotherapySame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207