MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108621533 · doi:10.1109/robot.2000.845291

Kinematic graspability of a 2D multifingered hand

2002· article· en· W2108621533 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsGRASPObject (grammar)Set (abstract data type)Configuration spaceNonlinear systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Space (punctuation)Topology (electrical circuits)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceClassical mechanicsPhysicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a solution to the problem of determining the kinematic feasibility of a dextrous hand to grasp a given object at a desired configuration in the two dimensional space. We refer to this problem as kinematic graspability. The kinematic configuration of a grasp is defined in terms of a set of contact pairs between the topological features of the hand and the object. We derive the sufficient conditions in order for the hand to make the desired contact and avoid collision. These conditions are then formulated as a constrained nonlinear global optimization problem, whose solution yields a definitive answer to kinematic graspability for a grasp configuration. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207