Lactoferrin: influences on Langerhans cells, epidermal cytokines, and cutaneous inflammation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been suggested previously that, in addition to other biological roles, lactoferrin (LF) may display antiinflammatory properties secondary to the regulation of cytokine expression. To explore this concept further, we have here examined in human volunteers the influence of recombinant homologous LF on the migration of epidermal Langerhans cells (LC), a process that is known to be dependent upon the local availability of certain proinflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta). In common with previous studies in mice, it was found that topical administration of LF prior to exposure at the same site to the contact sensitizer diphenylcyclopropenone resulted in a significant reduction of allergen-induced LC migration from the epidermis (measured as a function of the frequency of CD1a+ or HLA-DR+ LC found in epidermal sheets prepared from punch biopsies of the treated skin sites). However, under the same conditions of exposure, LF was unable to influence migration of LC induced by the intradermal administration of TNF-alpha data consistent with the hypothesis that one action of LF in the skin is to regulate the local production of this cytokine. Further support for this hypothesis was derived from experiments conducted with IL-1beta. This cytokine is also able to induce the mobilization of LC following intradermal injection, although in this case, migration is known to be dependent upon the de novo production of TNF-alpha. We observed that prior exposure to LF resulted in a substantial inhibition of IL-1beta-induced LC migration, data again consistent with the regulation of TNF-alpha production by LF. Collectively, these results support the view that LF is able to influence cutaneous immune and inflammatory processes secondary to regulation of the production of TNF-alpha and possibly other cytokines.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Lactoferrin effects on Langerhans cells and cutaneous inflammation; immunology.
This biomedical experiment studies lactoferrin and inflammation rather than research methodology.
Biomedical study of lactoferrin effects on Langerhans cells and cutaneous inflammation.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".