MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109579231 · doi:10.1109/afrcon.2009.5308124

Design and implementation of power system stabilizers based on evolutionary algorithms

2009· article· en· W2109579231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversity of Cape TownUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsEvolutionary algorithmElectric power systemComputer scienceGenetic algorithmPower (physics)PopulationEvolutionary computationAlgorithm designControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringControl (management)Machine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the design and implementation of power system stabilizers based on newly introduced evolutionary algorithms, namely the population- based incremental learning (PBIL) and the breeder genetic algorithm (BGA) with adaptive mutation. The designed PSSs were implemented on a power system experimental setup and the experimental results are presented in this paper. A conventional power system stabilizer (CPSS) was also designed and implemented for comparison purposes. In total three PSSs were designed and implemented, and their performance compared. It was found that CPSS gives the worst performance and BGA-PSS performs better than the PBIL-PSS for the specific case described in this paper, with the electrical power used as the input to the PSS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207