MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109742711 · doi:10.1149/1.1420706

Electrical Properties of Yttrium-Doped Strontium Titanate under Reducing Conditions

2002· article· en· W2109742711 on OpenAlexafffund
Shiqiang Hui, Anthony Petric

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsYttriumElectrical resistivity and conductivityConductivityMaterials scienceDopantDopingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Strontium titanateStrontiumSolubilityMineralogyPartial pressureOxygenInorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryOxideThin filmNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrical conductivity of containing rare earth dopants (Y, La, Pr, Sm, Nd, Gd, or Yb) was measured at 600-900°C in reducing atmospheres. An unusually high conductivity was observed for the yttrium-doped samples compared to those with rare earth dopants, particularly at the composition of the solubility limit where the conductivity at 800°C was 64 S/cm. The conductivity was confirmed to be n-type by thermopower measurements. The oxygen deficiency was determined to be 1% by thermogravimetric analysis. Increasing the strontium vacancy concentration to effected a further improvement in conductivity to 82 S/cm. This material has high structural stability over a broad range of temperature (up to 1400°C) and oxygen partial pressure A simple defect model was developed to explain the change of electrical conductivity as a function of yttrium content and oxygen deficiency. © 2001 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations226
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207