MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109882860 · doi:10.1287/moor.1040.0097

Existence and Properties of Optimal Production and Inventory Policies

2004· article· en· W2109882860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsProduction (economics)Mathematical economicsMathematical optimizationMicroeconomicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is an important and fundamental question whether an optimal inventory policy exists for a general deterministic multi-item, multistage (GDMM) production and inventory model. We show that an inventory model with a nonsubadditive ordering cost function could have no optimal policy over a finite horizon. However, when the ordering cost is a subadditive function an optimal policy exists for a GDMM production and inventory model over both a finite horizon and an infinite horizon. Properties of optimal inventory policies are crucial to investigating an inventory problem. We present four properties of optimal policies: (1) nonpositive inventory ordering, (2) last-minute ordering, (3) extended last-minute ordering, and (4) nonnegative filling properties. They have been explicitly or implicitly used in analyzing many different inventory models. The last two properties have been used but not proved before.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it