Pressure viscosity coefficients and traction properties of synthetic lubricants for wind turbine gear systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Synthetic lubricants are increasingly used to provide equipment reliability for wind turbine gear boxes. The majority of synthetic lubricants used today are based on polyalphaolefins. In gear systems where contact pressures are high, the pressure viscosity coefficient and traction values of the lubricant are important fundamental properties. A comparison of these properties for a wind turbine lubricant based on a polyalphaolefin and two lubricants based on polyalkylene glycols has been undertaken. Pressure viscosity coefficients were calculated from viscosity measurements made using an ultra‐high pressure falling needle viscometer at pressures up to 50 000 psi. Significant differences in properties were observed with both polyalkylene glycol lubricants showing lower pressure viscosity coefficients and much lower traction values. A calculation of the film thickness values in the Hertzian contact zone suggests that polyalkylene glycol lubricants may provide elastohydrodynamic films that are approximately 25% thicker than polyalphaolefin lubricants. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it