MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110429185 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2004.824054

Competitive Splitting for Codebook Initialization

2004· article· en· W2110429185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookInitializationLinde–Buzo–Gray algorithmVector quantizationComputer scienceCode (set theory)AlgorithmScheme (mathematics)Code wordQuantization (signal processing)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Codebook initialization usually has a significant effect on the performance of vector quantization algorithms. This letter presents a new scheme of codebook initialization in which the competitive learning and code vector splitting are incorporated together to produce a good initial codebook. Based mainly on the geometrical measurements of the learning tracks of the code vectors, the competitive splitting mechanism shows an ability to appropriately allocate code vectors according to the spatial distribution of the input data and, therefore, tends to give a better initial codebook. Comparisons with other initialization techniques demonstrate the effectiveness of the new scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it