MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110492826 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2005.852414

Hybrid de-interlacing algorithm based on motion vector reliability

2005· article· en· W2110492826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterlacingMotion vectorQuarter-pixel motionComputer scienceAlgorithmMotion estimationReliability (semiconductor)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hybrid de-interlacing algorithm that converts video from interlaced format to progressive format. This hybrid algorithm effectively combines two existing de-interlacing techniques: one that offers high vertical resolution and the other that is robust to erroneous motion vectors. The combination is based on a new measurement of motion vector reliability, so that the hybrid algorithm is dominated by the high-resolution technique if motion vectors are reliable; otherwise, it approaches the robust technique. Motion vector reliability is measured using the a posteriori probability of motion vectors. Experimental results show that this is an effective measure of motion vector reliability. The hybrid algorithm offers high spatial resolution without artifacts caused by erroneous motion vectors, and outperforms four of the best existing techniques in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it