REED in Review: Essays in Celebration of the First Twenty-Five Years * Audrey Douglas and Sally-Beth MacLean (eds).
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Records of Early English Drama project, based at the University of Toronto, aims to create a systematic record of all documentary traces of drama before the year 1642, for the whole of England (although increasingly the definition of ‘England’ is being treated as elastic, with Scottish and Welsh records also becoming part of the project). Started in 1976, REED has produced outputs so far in forms including a series of authoritative print volumes, each covering a geographical area; a number of websites; an entire scholarly journal, Early Theatre; and a huge weight of related publication. In REED in Review, a number of contributors examine the past, present, and future of this major scholarly project. The REED project, and therefore also this associated book, is likely to be of interest to readers of LLC for a number of different reasons. The first of them has little, directly, to...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it