MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111009215

On a geometric approach to the segment sum problem and its generalization

2007· article· en· W2111009215 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Conference on Computational Geometry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationCombinatoricsMonotone polygonMathematicsOptimization problemSequence (biology)Subset sum problemDiscrete mathematicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmKnapsack problemGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a sequence of n real numbers a1,a2,a3,...,an, the maximum segment sum problem is that of determin- ing indices i and j (1 � ijn) such that the sum s(i,j) = ai + ai+1 + ... + aj is a maximum. Monotone matrices were shown to be remarkably effective in solv- ing several geometric optimization problems. The sur- prise is that it can also be applied to the above problem as we show here. Recently, there was a breakthrough in obtaining an O(nlogn) algorithm for the kth smallest segment sum problem by exploiting a connection of this problem to the well-known slope selection problem. In this paper we show that this problem can also be solved within the same time bounds in the simpler framework of expander graphs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it