Bibliographic record
Abstract
In late sixteenth-century Spain Lucas Gracian Dantisco adapted Giovanni Della Casa's Galateo (1558) for a Spanish audience. The editorial success the Galateo espanol (c. 1582) enjoyed can be attributed to Gracian Dantisco's keen sensitivity to the social, cultural and consumer demands of his age. Those needs and demands are best evidenced by analysing three interrelated topics: the influence of the court, the significance of a consumer audience and the rise in popularity of prose fiction. In transforming the Galateo into the Galateo espanol Gracian Dantisco put into practice the basic strategy of pragmatic accommodation to the wishes and tastes of others that Della Casa's treatise aimed to teach. The accommodation to consumer audience needs ensures and explains the success of the Galateo espanol in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Spain.A finales del siglo XVI Lucas Gracian Dantisco realizo una adaptacion del Galateo (1558) de Giovanni Della Casa destinada a un publico espanol. El exito editorial del qu...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".