MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111081406 · doi:10.3828/bhs.2010.38

Court, Market and the Fashioning of the <i>Galateo español</i>

2010· article· en· W2111081406 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Hispanic Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In late sixteenth-century Spain Lucas Gracian Dantisco adapted Giovanni Della Casa's Galateo (1558) for a Spanish audience. The editorial success the Galateo espanol (c. 1582) enjoyed can be attributed to Gracian Dantisco's keen sensitivity to the social, cultural and consumer demands of his age. Those needs and demands are best evidenced by analysing three interrelated topics: the influence of the court, the significance of a consumer audience and the rise in popularity of prose fiction. In transforming the Galateo into the Galateo espanol Gracian Dantisco put into practice the basic strategy of pragmatic accommodation to the wishes and tastes of others that Della Casa's treatise aimed to teach. The accommodation to consumer audience needs ensures and explains the success of the Galateo espanol in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Spain.A finales del siglo XVI Lucas Gracian Dantisco realizo una adaptacion del Galateo (1558) de Giovanni Della Casa destinada a un publico espanol. El exito editorial del qu...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it