Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Starch granules viewed under a polarizing microscope may exhibit vivid interference colors – how can they be measured? A tilting compensator was used to generate interference colors, they were measured by spectrophotometry (400–700 nm at 10 nm intervals), and the weighted ordinate method was used to calculate chromaticity coordinates. There was a reasonable correspondence between the subjective terms used to describe interference colors, and those used for the CIE diagram. Three different charts of interference colors were measured by fiber‐optics – only one was close to the interference colors of the tilting compensator (r = 0.805 for CIE x, and r = 0.874 for CIE y, both P < 0.005). The spectra of various interference colors were like sine waves, whereas the matching spectra from charts were irregular with occasional peaks or dips. Thus, radically different spectra shared very similar chromaticity coordinates. As anticipated from first principles, the diameter of starch granules had a strong effect on their chromaticity coordinates (from r = 0.78 to r = 0.87, all P < 0.001). © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 41, 352–357, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".