MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111705825 · doi:10.1002/nme.4754

A new five‐node locking‐free quadrilateral element based on smoothed FEM for near‐incompressible linear elasticity

2014· article· en· W2111705825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrilateralFinite element methodMathematicsSmoothingCentroidHexahedronMathematical analysisCompressibilityNode (physics)GeometryApplied mathematicsStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The volumetric locking issue is critical in finite element analysis of nearly incompressible problems. In this paper, a new five‐node quadrilateral element (Q5) is proposed by enriching the four‐node quadrilateral element (Q4) with a centroid node to solve the volumetric locking problem in FEM. The cell‐based smoothed FEM is employed with Q5 element (referred as Q5‐CS‐SC4) to soften the stiffness in order to obtain a better solution. To eliminate pressure oscillation in near‐incompressible problems, an edge‐based area‐weighted smoothing scheme incorporated with the cell‐wise divergence‐free Q5 element is carried out (referred as Q5‐EAW), and an adjustable area‐weighted strain smoothing scheme using a parameter p is proposed to improve the performance of the Q5 element in dealing with incompressible media (referred as Q5‐ p EAW). The formulation of Q5‐ p EAW is a simple combination of Q5‐CS‐SC4 and Q5‐EAW by an adjustable area weight. It can search the exact strain energy of the problem in near‐incompressible cases. We also introduce another node‐based strain smoothing technique (Q5‐NAW) into the domain‐based selective scheme to obtain a Q5‐ p EAW/NAW model to solve the pressure oscillation, which gives a much smoother pressure solution than Q5‐EAW. Finally, the Q5 element is extended into hexahedral element to develop a nine‐node hexahedral (H9) element shape function by enriching the eight‐node hexahedral element (Q8) with a centroid node. An H9‐Gi/NAW model similar to Q5‐ p EAW/NAW is proposed by using H9 element to solve the 3D volumetric locking. A series of benchmark problems are provided to demonstrate that the proposed Q5‐ p EAW/NAW for 2D plane strain problems, and H9‐Gi/NAW model for 3D cases are locking‐free for nearly incompressible problems. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it