Fast Adaptation of Deep Neural Network Based on Discriminant Codes for Speech Recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fast adaptation of deep neural networks (DNN) is an important research topic in deep learning. In this paper, we have proposed a general adaptation scheme for DNN based on discriminant condition codes, which are directly fed to various layers of a pre-trained DNN through a new set of connection weights. Moreover, we present several training methods to learn connection weights from training data as well as the corresponding adaptation methods to learn new condition code from adaptation data for each new test condition. In this work, the fast adaptation scheme is applied to supervised speaker adaptation in speech recognition based on either frame-level cross-entropy or sequence-level maximum mutual information training criterion. We have proposed three different ways to apply this adaptation scheme based on the so-called speaker codes: i) Nonlinear feature normalization in feature space; ii) Direct model adaptation of DNN based on speaker codes; iii) Joint speaker adaptive training with speaker codes. We have evaluated the proposed adaptation methods in two standard speech recognition tasks, namely TIMIT phone recognition and large vocabulary speech recognition in the Switchboard task. Experimental results have shown that all three methods are quite effective to adapt large DNN models using only a small amount of adaptation data. For example, the Switchboard results have shown that the proposed speaker-code-based adaptation methods may achieve up to 8-10% relative error reduction using only a few dozens of adaptation utterances per speaker. Finally, we have achieved very good performance in Switchboard (12.1% in WER) after speaker adaptation using sequence training criterion, which is very close to the best performance reported in this task (“Deep convolutional neural networks for LVCSR,” T. N. Sainath , Proc. IEEE Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2013).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it