Fast Adaptation of Deep Neural Network Based on Discriminant Codes for Speech Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fast adaptation of deep neural networks (DNN) is an important research topic in deep learning. In this paper, we have proposed a general adaptation scheme for DNN based on discriminant condition codes, which are directly fed to various layers of a pre-trained DNN through a new set of connection weights. Moreover, we present several training methods to learn connection weights from training data as well as the corresponding adaptation methods to learn new condition code from adaptation data for each new test condition. In this work, the fast adaptation scheme is applied to supervised speaker adaptation in speech recognition based on either frame-level cross-entropy or sequence-level maximum mutual information training criterion. We have proposed three different ways to apply this adaptation scheme based on the so-called speaker codes: i) Nonlinear feature normalization in feature space; ii) Direct model adaptation of DNN based on speaker codes; iii) Joint speaker adaptive training with speaker codes. We have evaluated the proposed adaptation methods in two standard speech recognition tasks, namely TIMIT phone recognition and large vocabulary speech recognition in the Switchboard task. Experimental results have shown that all three methods are quite effective to adapt large DNN models using only a small amount of adaptation data. For example, the Switchboard results have shown that the proposed speaker-code-based adaptation methods may achieve up to 8-10% relative error reduction using only a few dozens of adaptation utterances per speaker. Finally, we have achieved very good performance in Switchboard (12.1% in WER) after speaker adaptation using sequence training criterion, which is very close to the best performance reported in this task (“Deep convolutional neural networks for LVCSR,” T. N. Sainath , Proc. IEEE Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2013).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".