MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Myocarditis

2013· article· en· W2112175706 on OpenAlexaff
Matthias G. Friedrich, François Marcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Imaging · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocarditisMedicineCardiac magnetic resonanceMagnetic resonance imagingCardiologyAcute myocarditisInternal medicineCardiac magnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S ymptoms consistent with myocarditis are a frequent cause of medical visits, especially in young and middleaged patients.Moreover, myocarditis was found to be the most frequent disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome yet normal coronary arteries. 1Although many causes have been identified, acute cases are mostly because of myocardial involvement in systemic viral disease. 2,3During the first days of viral myocarditis, there is direct cardiomyocyte injury, accompanied by edema, necrosis, and, depending on its spatial extent, regional, or even global contractile dysfunction.The tissue is typically cleared from the virus within 5 days; yet, reactive inflammation (clean-up) may last for several weeks.In uncomplicated disease, there is full tissue and functional recovery within 3 to 4 weeks, whereas more severe disease necrosis results in myocardial scarring.Prolonged autoimmune response or virus persistence may lead to chronic inflammation and is considered a frequent cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. 3ymptoms are not specific; patients may present with chest pain, fatigue, dyspnea, or arrhythmia.ECG findings may include AV block, ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmia, and ST changes, including severe elevation mimicking acute myocardial infarction.Except for more severe cases, echocardiography typically shows normal systolic wall motion or just mild regional dysfunction.Serological markers for cardiomyocyte injury, such as troponin, may be normal.Because of the nonspecificity of its symptoms, signs and test findings, myocarditis is often diagnosed by exclusion of other cardiac diseases.The specific identification of an active nonischemic inflammatory process, therefore, is a clinical challenge, especially in patients presenting with acute chest pain and heart failure.Invasive endomyocardial biopsy is only recommended in patients with evidence for heart failure in combination with acute disease (<2 weeks, class I) or left ventricular dilatation (<3 months, class I) or specific other cases of heart failure (class IIa). 4 While nuclear imaging methods have not been proven useful, echocardiography and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are standard imaging tools in patients with suspected myocarditis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations189
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207