MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112474319 · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.915173

Decentralized Supervisory Control of Discrete-Event Systems Over Communication Networks

2008· article· en· W2112474319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupervisory controlComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Distributed computingEvent (particle physics)Class (philosophy)Control (management)Process (computing)Telecommunications networkCommunications systemCommunications protocolComputer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the problem of designing embedded decentralized discrete-event controllers over communication networks. It is assumed that there is a path between every pair of processes in the network. The control objective is specified by a prefix-closed language that is controllable and observable, but not coobservable. The paper is focused on communication among processes necessary to meet the control objective. As such, process models are left unspecified; it is only required that disabling any of the controllable events do not block communication among processes. Our findings support the idea that in the presence of ideal communication channels, the protocol design for noncoobservable specifications can be reduced to the synthesis of communicating decentralized supervisors, and we propose solutions for a restricted class of problems. The paper is concluded with a positive result for the case where channels are unreliable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it