MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112786698 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2000.849691

Short term load forecasting by using wavelet neural networks

2002· article· en· W2112786698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkBackpropagationComputer scienceMorlet waveletFeedforward neural networkWaveletTime delay neural networkProbabilistic neural networkActivation functionConvergence (economics)Artificial intelligenceGeneralizationWavelet transformTerm (time)Function approximationMachine learningDiscrete wavelet transformMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of the wavelet neural networks (WNNs) to short-term load forecasting is reported in this work. The wavelet neural network has much higher ability of generalization and fast convergence for learning than a multilayer feedforward neural network. The Morlet wavelet has been chosen in this study as the activation function. The 3-layer backpropagation algorithm is used to train the network by learning the nonlinear relationship between input and output of the network. The input data consists of historical load and weather information, which are collected over a period of 2-years (1994-1995) to train the network and data of one year (1996) is used to test the network. The results of the network have been compared with an artificial neural network and show an improved forecast with fast convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207