MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112868684 · doi:10.5093/ed2011v17n2a3

El Impacto de las Nuevas Tecnologías y las Nuevas Formas de Relación en el Desarrollo

2011· article· es· W2112868684 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologí a Educativa · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman multitaskingSolitudePsychologyReading (process)Set (abstract data type)CognitionCognitive developmentNeuropsychologyValue (mathematics)HumanitiesDevelopmental psychologyPolitical scienceArtCognitive psychologyComputer sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a review of the aspects of cognitive and relational development that are being influenced by technological progress. It describes the impact on neuropsychological and cognitive skills exercised through the use of technology. Continuous partial attention, multitasking and new ways of reading are activities that, intensively trained, can lead to negative results for child and adolescent development. On the other hand, new forms of relationships raise questions about the value of solitude, communication and identity in the technological age. Finally, we set out the characteristics that best describe this new generation according to some of the media´s most influential figures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it