MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

At Home in the New Germany? Local Stories and Global Concerns in Yüksel Yavuz's <i>Aprilkinder</i> and <i>Kleine Freiheit</i>

2009· article· en· W2112960609 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyGender studiesMovie theaterOppressionIdentity (music)FilmmakingGermanAestheticsContext (archaeology)PoliticsPolitical scienceArtLiteratureHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper situates Yüksel Yavuz's films in the context of discussions about identity politics and filmmaking style in Turkish‐German cinema. Scholars have recognized a shift from films of the 1970s and 1980s depicting migrants—characterized by oppression, nostalgia, and binary models of identity—to a contemporary cinema that eschews notions of essential Otherness. Many argue that shifting models of identity necessitate new cinematic styles, in which humor plays a prominent role in dismantling discourses of victimization and positing the “pleasures of hybridity”. This essay shows that while Yavuz's films employ some aesthetic practices familiar from more social‐realist traditions—thereby highlighting the fundamental displeasures of ongoing civil inequalities—they nevertheless explore complex configurations of identities based not just on language or ethnicity but also on gender, sexuality, race and class. Yavuz's films thus comment on changing notions of home and belonging for both migrants and German nationals in ethnically‐mixed urban centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it