Robust recognition of 3-D faces based on analytic forms and spectral analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the main objectives of face recognition is to determine whether an acquired face belongs to a reference database and to subsequently identify the corresponding individual. Face recognition has application in, for instance, forensic science and security. A face recognition algorithm, to be useful in real applications, must discriminate in between individuals, process data in real-time and be robust against occlusion, facial expression and noise. A new method for robust recognition of three-dimensional faces is presented. The method is based on harmonic coding, Hilbert transform and spectral analysis of 3-D depth distributions. Experimental results with three-dimensional faces, which were scanned with a laser scanner, are presented The proposed method recognises a face with various facial expressions in the presence of occlusion, has a good discrimination, is able to compare a face against a large database of faces in real-time and is robust against shot noise and additive noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it