MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113136578 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2003.1202633

Blind separation of BPSK signals using Newton's method on the Stiefel manifold

2004· article· en· W2113136578 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03). · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiefel manifoldBlind signal separationPhase-shift keyingRate of convergenceAlgorithmMathematicsQuadratic equationManifold (fluid mechanics)Independent component analysisConvergence (economics)Newton's methodComputational complexity theorySeparation (statistics)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationBit error rateNonlinear systemDecoding methodsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsStatisticsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new approach to solving the problem of blind separation of BPSK signals. Using the constant modulus property of the signal, we formulate this problem as a constrained minimization problem that can be solved efficiently using an extended Newton's method on the Stiefel manifold. Compared with the existing separation methods, the proposed method is quite robust to additive noise, achieves a low bit error rate, and enjoys a quadratic convergence rate and a low computational complexity. Simulation results show that our method is a competitive blind separation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it